FIELD NOTES / AFGHANISTAN

Operation HERRICK: Complete British Afghanistan Campaign Guide — Kabul, Helmand, Transition & Withdrawal // Log 041

Afghan and British supply vehicles on a combat logistics patrol in Helmand during Operation HERRICK 14, May 2011

I do not think Operation HERRICK can be understood as one unchanging war. The force around Kabul in the early 2000s, the battle groups dispersed across Helmand from 2006, the surge-era force of 2009–10 and the advisory mission approaching 2014 were operating in different circumstances and with changing objectives.

My own service background is as a Royal Welsh mortarman, including operational service in Afghanistan. That makes me naturally interested in ground, observation, supporting fire, ammunition, patrol routine and the strain placed on small positions. It does not make my tour representative of everyone else's, so where another person's first-hand experience belongs in the story I identify it rather than borrowing it.

At a glance

  • Operation: HERRICK, 2003–2014.
  • Framework: the UK contribution to NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).
  • Main UK geographic focus from 2006: Helmand Province.
  • Defining problems: dispersed district positions, Green Zone terrain, IEDs, protected mobility, fire support, coalition coordination, Afghan partnering and transition.
  • End of UK combat operations in Helmand: Camp Bastion handover, 26 October 2014.
  • Operation HERRICK ends: 31 December 2014.

2001–2003: before HERRICK

British forces took part in the opening operations against al-Qaeda and the Taliban after 9/11 and contributed to the International Security Assistance Force in Kabul. NATO assumed command of ISAF in August 2003. MOD records use Operation HERRICK for the UK campaign from 2003 onward.

The distinction matters. HERRICK was not the name of the initial October 2001 intervention, and the later NATO mission had a different political and legal framework from the opening US-led Operation Enduring Freedom.

ISAF expands beyond Kabul

ISAF gradually expanded through Provincial Reconstruction Teams and regional commands. The mission combined security, support to Afghan institutions, training and development activity while insurgent networks strengthened in parts of the south and east.

Britain agreed to take a major role in Helmand as NATO expanded into southern Afghanistan in 2006.

2006: the move into Helmand

16 Air Assault Brigade deployed as the first major UK formation in Helmand. The initial concept centred on security and reconstruction around selected population centres, with headquarters at Lashkar Gah and a developing logistics hub at Camp Bastion.

Reality changed the scheme rapidly. Afghan authorities requested support in threatened district centres including Sangin, Musa Qala, Now Zad and Garmsir. Small British forces were dispersed into positions that became known as platoon houses. These sites faced repeated Taliban attacks and difficult resupply.

The decision prevented some district centres from falling immediately, but it tied a relatively small force to exposed positions over a large province. A campaign plan built around influence and reconstruction became much more heavily shaped by direct combat and the requirement to hold ground.

Helmand was never just desert

The Helmand River and irrigation system create a densely cultivated Green Zone of fields, compounds, tree lines, canals and ditches bordered by open desert. That contrast shaped observation, patrol movement and vehicle routes.

On foot, a few hundred metres could involve high walls, irrigation crossings and narrow gaps. Vehicles were channelled onto tracks and bridges. Predictable routes became natural locations for ambushes and improvised explosive devices.

For the Musa Qalah ground I hand over to Jamie in Log 042 — Helmand Province. He served on HERRICK 10/11 with 3 Platoon, A Company, 2 Royal Welsh at Minden PB, so that article can speak from a place this campaign guide should not pretend is mine.

Sangin, Musa Qala and the northern districts

Sangin became one of the most heavily contested areas of the British campaign. Insurgent networks, narcotics, local politics, difficult terrain and the need to keep routes open overlapped in one district.

At Musa Qala British forces withdrew under a locally negotiated arrangement in 2006. The Taliban later took control of the town. Afghan and coalition forces retook it in December 2007.

These episodes exposed a central campaign problem: holding a district centre is not the same as controlling the district. Routes, surrounding villages, local power relationships and the ability of Afghan institutions to remain after coalition troops leave all matter.

Camp Bastion: the industrial rear of a patrol war

Camp Bastion grew from a remote desert base into the central British logistics and aviation hub in Helmand. Its airfield, hospital, maintenance facilities and supply network supported operations across the province.

I think it is important not to let Bastion become the mental picture of everyone's Afghanistan. Large, well-supported infrastructure and isolated patrol bases existed simultaneously. The distance between those experiences is part of HERRICK.

The IED war

Improvised explosive devices became one of the campaign's defining threats. They affected where people walked, where vehicles moved, how long apparently short journeys took and how much concentration a routine patrol demanded.

Electronic countermeasures, specialist search, intelligence, route clearance and handheld detectors became part of daily movement. For many infantry patrols the Vallon detector and the soldier carrying it became an immediately recognisable feature of the campaign.

Log 043 — Vallon Patrols and the IED-search problem →

Warrior and protected mobility

Warrior infantry fighting vehicles deployed with British armoured infantry in Helmand. Tracks, armour and the 30mm RARDEN cannon offered protected mobility and direct fire support in conditions where some wheeled platforms struggled.

Warrior was not invulnerable. The IED threat forced continual changes to protection, tactics, recovery planning and route choice. Infantry and vehicle crews depended on one another while operating in terrain that could rapidly separate them.

Log 044 — Warrior IFV in Afghanistan →

2009: Panther's Claw and the surge

In 2009 NATO and US force levels increased substantially. British-led Operation Panther's Claw involved more than 3,000 troops and sought to establish control around key crossings and populated areas before Afghan elections. US Marines simultaneously took a much larger role in Helmand as the American surge altered the coalition balance in the province.

The same year brought intense combat and a sharp increase in British casualties, alongside public debate over equipment, helicopters, force levels and strategy.

For 2nd Battalion The Royal Welsh, 2009 also carries three names that belong in the record but should never be flattened into one company, one incident or one man's memories.

Remembrance — H, Hunty and Pross

Lance Corporal Christopher “H” Harkett, 2 Royal Welsh, was serving with C Company when he was killed by an explosion near Musa Qaleh on 14 March 2009. He had reconnaissance and sniper experience and was moving to provide covering fire during a C Company foot patrol when the explosion occurred.

Private Richard “Hunty” Hunt served in 2 Platoon, A Company, 2 Royal Welsh. He had trained as a Warrior driver. He was wounded by an explosion during a vehicle patrol near Musa Qalah on 13 August 2009 and died from his wounds at Selly Oak on 15 August.

Private James “Pross” Prosser also served in 2 Platoon, A Company, 2 Royal Welsh and was a Warrior driver. He was killed by an IED while driving a Warrior in the Musa Qalah district on 27 September 2009.

I keep Jamie's 3 Platoon service, H's C Company chronology and Hunty and Pross's 2 Platoon service separate because remembrance becomes less truthful, not more personal, when those distinctions are blurred.

2010: Operation Moshtarak

Operation Moshtarak was a large Afghan-coalition offensive in central Helmand, particularly around Marjah and Nad Ali. It was intended to combine military clearance with the rapid arrival of Afghan governance and development.

The operation illustrated the limits of treating tactical clearance as the end state. Removing insurgents from a locality was only the first phase; the harder test was whether security and legitimate administration could persist afterward.

Partnering and Afghanisation

Training and partnering with the Afghan National Army and police became increasingly central. British units mentored Afghan formations and gradually transferred responsibility for operations. By 2013 Afghan security forces had formally taken the lead for security nationwide.

This changed the British role from routinely leading combat operations toward training, advising and support. It also exposed the strategic dependence of transition on Afghan institutions being able to sustain themselves after coalition force reductions.

Drawdown and the end of HERRICK

Main Operating Base Lashkar Gah served for years as the UK headquarters in Helmand. Task Force Helmand headquarters moved to Camp Bastion in 2013, and Lashkar Gah was handed to Afghan forces in February 2014.

The drawdown was itself a major logistics operation: closing patrol bases, moving or disposing of vehicles and containers, reducing aviation and support infrastructure and transferring facilities.

UK combat operations in Helmand formally ended with the handover of Camp Bastion on 26 October 2014. Operation HERRICK concluded on 31 December 2014. British personnel remained afterward under Operation TORAL as part of NATO's Resolute Support mission.

Loss, service and the Afghan cost

Hundreds of British service personnel died during the Afghanistan deployment and many more were wounded, injured or medically evacuated. Families and veterans carried consequences far beyond the dates of individual tours.

Afghan military, police and civilian losses were far larger. Different datasets cover different years and categories, so I avoid forcing one contested aggregate into a simple headline figure.

2021 and the strategic argument

The Afghan republic and its security forces continued fighting after HERRICK ended. In 2021, after the withdrawal of most remaining international forces, the Taliban captured provincial capitals and entered Kabul. The republic collapsed and the Taliban returned to power.

I do not think that outcome can be removed from any serious assessment of the campaign's strategic legacy. Nor do I think it means every local improvement, tactical success, Afghan relationship or individual sacrifice can simply be declared meaningless after the fact. Tactical performance, campaign objectives and political outcome are connected, but they are not identical questions.

The Gallus HERRICK trail

  1. Log 040 — Political Road to Intervention
  2. Log 041 — Operation HERRICK Complete Campaign Guide
  3. Log 042 — Helmand Province / Musa Qalah / Minden PB
  4. Log 043 — Vallon Patrols
  5. Log 044 — Warrior IFV
  6. Log 045 — Kunar Province 2005

Related Gallus pieces

I keep the remembrance material above complete before any merchandise appears.

Sources and further reading

I use my own service perspective where it genuinely helps me interpret terrain, fire support and campaign friction. When Jamie's first-hand Musa Qalah experience belongs in the story I either hand over to his article or mark his words as his, rather than making one veteran voice stand in for another.

Browse topics

    Share this